termiNIL / Analysis / Georgia NIL Roster Value: #1 Ranked Team, #4 Richest Roster
Data

Georgia NIL Roster Value: #1 Ranked Team, #4 Richest Roster

The short answer

termiNIL prices Georgia's football roster at $48.03 million across 126 scholarship players, the fourth-highest total in college football even though the Bulldogs are ranked #1 in the country on the field. Quarterback Gunner Stockton is the roster's biggest single number at $5.10 million, and quarterback is Georgia's most valuable position group at 18.30% of roster value, the pattern the national market would predict, unlike some rosters where wide receiver edges ahead.

Key takeaways
  • Georgia's roster carries $48.03M in modeled NIL value as of October 6, 2026, fourth among all 138 FBS programs despite the Bulldogs' #1 ranking on the field.
  • That total sits 1.06% ahead of #5 Notre Dame ($47.53M) but 3.32% behind #3 Ohio State ($49.63M) and 8.03% behind #1 Oregon ($51.89M).
  • Georgia's 126 players average $381K each, 1.76 times the $216K national mean across 15,066 tracked players.
  • Quarterback is Georgia's most valuable position group at 18.30% of roster value, followed by wide receiver (16.02%) and edge rusher (13.76%) — unlike the national market, where wide receivers hold 6.22% more total dollars than quarterbacks despite quarterbacks carrying a 3.5x median premium.
  • Gunner Stockton leads the roster at $5.10M, 3.31 times the next-highest Bulldog, edge rusher Gabe Harris ($1.54M), and 10.62% of the entire roster's value on his own.
  • Georgia's $48.03M is 1.47% of the sport's entire $3.26B NIL market on its own, and 2.03 times the $23.63M average FBS program.

Georgia enters the week ranked #1 in the country. termiNIL's model ranks its roster #4: $48.03 million in modeled NIL value, behind Oregon, Texas and Ohio State. The two rankings measure different things, and the gap between them is the more interesting number than either total on its own.

Most "richest roster" lists stop at the headline figure and move on. The more useful questions for a roster this talented are where the money actually concentrates and how far on-field performance and NIL value have drifted apart.

How much is Georgia's NIL roster worth in 2026?

$48.03 million, as of October 6, 2026, spread across 126 scholarship players. That's the fourth-highest roster value of any of the 138 programs in termiNIL's model — 8.03% behind Oregon ($51.89M), 4.15% behind Texas ($50.02M), 3.32% behind Ohio State ($49.63M), and 1.06% ahead of Notre Dame ($47.53M).

#PlayerPosClassValueGrade
1Gunner StocktonQBSR$5.10MA
2Gabe HarrisDESR$1.54MA
3Isiah CanionWRJR$1.48MB
4Chris ColeSJR$1.19MA+
5Elijah GriffinDTSO$1.06MB+
6Zayden WalkerSSO$1.04MC+
7Raylen WilsonLBSR$1.04MA+
8Demello JonesCBJR$1.02MB+
9Ellis RobinsonCBSO$1.01MC
10Joseph Jonah-AjonyeDESO$1.00MF

Stockton is worth 3.31 times tenth-ranked Joseph Jonah-Ajonye, and his $5.10 million is more than triple the next-highest Bulldog, edge rusher Gabe Harris at $1.54 million. After Stockton, the roster's value spreads broadly: three defensive backs, two edge/tackle-area linemen and a linebacker all cluster between $1.0M and $1.2M, rather than stacking behind one or two stars.

Why is the #1 team only the #4 NIL roster?

Georgia's on-field ranking and its NIL valuation are built from different inputs. The College Football Playoff committee and the AP poll weigh wins, margin and schedule strength; termiNIL weighs performance grade, position premium and audience, repriced continuously as the season runs. A team can lead the country on the field while sitting behind three rosters that carry more total dollars — Georgia trails Oregon by 8.03% and Texas by 4.15%, both single-digit gaps that a few repricings could close or widen. The lesson isn't that Georgia is undervalued; it's that "best team" and "most expensive roster" are two different leaderboards that happen to overlap only partially.

Which position group is worth the most on Georgia's roster?

Quarterback leads, as the national pattern would predict — 18.30% of roster value, ahead of wide receiver (16.02%) and edge rusher (13.76%).

PositionShare of roster value
Quarterback18.30%
Wide receiver16.02%
Edge rusher13.76%
Safety10.99%
Cornerback8.28%

That's actually the less common shape at the team level. Across termiNIL's full 15,066-player market, the median quarterback ($553K) is worth 3.5 times the median wide receiver ($158K) — yet nationally wide receiver still holds 6.22% more total dollars than quarterback ($640.59M vs $603.09M), because more than three times as many receivers get priced (2,113 vs 700). Georgia's roster doesn't follow that market-wide inversion: its quarterback share (18.30%) runs 14.22% higher than its wide receiver share (16.02%), carried almost entirely by one enormous number in Stockton.

How does Georgia compare to the rest of college football?

The average FBS roster is worth $23.63 million. Georgia's is worth 2.03 times that, and its $381K average per player is 1.76 times the $216K mean across the sport's 15,066 tracked players. Georgia's $48.03M also represents 1.47% of the entire $3.26B national NIL market on its own.

What isn't in this number?

termiNIL's plausibility audit holds eight Georgia valuations out of the ranked tables above — Isaiah Gibson, Talyn Taylor, Ryan Puglisi, Ekene Ogboko, Kaiden Prothro, Elyiss Williams, Jahzare Jackson and Dante Dowdell, several priced in seven figures at backup depth-chart spots without enough grade or snap data yet to support those numbers. All eight are excluded from the leaderboards until the model has more to work with, but their dollars are still counted in the $48.03M roster total — that figure, like every team total on termiNIL, includes every scholarship player regardless of ranking eligibility.

Georgia's full roster, position by position, is browsable in the termiNIL terminal. For how the Bulldogs stack up against the rest of the sport, see Ohio State's NIL roster value and how NIL valuations are calculated.

Frequently asked questions

What is Georgia's total NIL roster value?
termiNIL prices Georgia's football roster at $48.03 million as of October 6, 2026, spread across 126 scholarship players. That's the fourth-highest roster value of any college football program in the model, behind Oregon ($51.89M), Texas ($50.02M) and Ohio State ($49.63M), and just ahead of Notre Dame ($47.53M).
Why isn't the #1 team also the #1 NIL roster?
On-field ranking and NIL valuation are different models measuring different things. Georgia is #1 in the country on the field but #4 by roster value, trailing three teams by margins of 1-8%. termiNIL's model prices performance grade, position, and audience, not win-loss record or playoff seeding.
Who is Georgia's most valuable NIL player?
Quarterback Gunner Stockton, modeled at $5.10 million. He's worth 3.31 times the next-highest Bulldog, edge rusher Gabe Harris at $1.54 million, and alone accounts for 10.62% of Georgia's entire roster value.
Is Georgia's roster value driven mostly by its quarterback room?
More than most. Quarterback is Georgia's single most valuable position group at 18.30% of roster value, followed by wide receiver (16.02%) and edge rusher (13.76%). That follows the shape the per-player premium would predict — nationally the median quarterback is worth 3.5 times the median wide receiver — even though nationally wide receivers still hold slightly more total dollars because far more of them get priced.
Why don't some Georgia players appear in this ranking?
termiNIL's plausibility audit holds eight Georgia valuations out of the ranked tables — several priced in seven figures at backup depth chart spots without enough grade or snap data yet to support the number. Their dollars still count toward the $48.03 million roster total; they just aren't named in a leaderboard until the model catches up.

See every number behind this

termiNIL prices all 14,000+ FBS players with one transparent model. Open the terminal and check any roster, position group, or player yourself.

Launch the terminal
Methodology note. All player valuations on termiNIL are modeled estimates produced by a transparent bottom-up factor model — position base × role × production grade × team × market × social reach. They are not reported salaries, verified contract figures, or statements of fact about any athlete's actual compensation, and they are calibrated on an ongoing basis against confirmed market data. termiNIL is independent and is not affiliated with the NCAA, the College Sports Commission, any school, collective, or agency.

Keep reading