termiNIL / Analysis / The Most Valuable Tight Ends in College Football, Ranked
Rankings

The Most Valuable Tight Ends in College Football, Ranked

The short answer

LSU's Trey'Dez Green is the most valuable tight end in college football at a modeled $1.00M, narrowly ahead of Texas Tech's Terrance Carter ($987K). Tight end already clears seven figures, unlike running back, but two true freshmen carry higher raw values — Oregon's Kendre Harrison ($1.32M) and USC's Mark Bowman ($1.28M) — that termiNIL's audit excludes for showing no grade or recorded snaps.

Key takeaways
  • LSU's Trey'Dez Green ($1.00M), Texas Tech's Terrance Carter ($987K) and Kansas State's Linkon Cure ($856K) are the three most valuable ranked tight ends in termiNIL's model.
  • Green's $1.00M is the only ranked tight end value to clear $1 million — a mark no running back has reached — and it leads Carter by less than 2%.
  • Two true freshmen, Oregon's Kendre Harrison ($1.32M) and USC's Mark Bowman ($1.28M), carry higher raw tight end values than any ranked player, but termiNIL's valuation audit excludes both for showing rich figures with no performance grade or recorded snaps.
  • Kansas State's Linkon Cure ranks third at $856K despite a grade of 9 out of 100 (an F) — a low-confidence case where the model's recruiting and opportunity signals are carrying more weight than current on-field grade.
  • Tight end's 90th percentile ($306K) is 3.97x its $77K median — tighter than running back (4.36x) and edge rusher (4.28x), though not as flat as quarterback (3.06x) or center (2.69x).
  • Tight ends make up 6.13% of every FBS player termiNIL prices but just 3.86% of the sport's $3.00B in modeled NIL value — a smaller share of the money than of the roster, totaling $115.86M across 890 players.

Most tight end rankings this time of year are catch totals or a highlight reel of blocks, with a value judgment bolted on afterward. That tells you who had a good fall, not what the position is worth — and it tends to reward the loudest fanbase over the actual role a player carries.

termiNIL prices all 890 FBS tight ends on the same model. This post ranks the leaders, then covers what a stat sheet can't: why tight end already has a player over $1 million when running back has never gotten there, why the position's two highest raw numbers aren't on this list at all, and where tight end sits among the sport's most and least top-heavy positions.

The short version: tight end's ceiling is real, but the model's single richest tight end figures right now belong to two freshmen the audit won't vouch for yet.

Who are the most valuable tight ends in college football?

#Tight EndTeamYrtermiNIL value
1Trey'Dez GreenLSUJR$1.00M
2Terrance CarterTexas TechSR$987K
3Linkon CureKansas StateSO$856K
4Luke LindenmeyerNebraskaSR$852K
5Jamari JohnsonOregonJR$837K
6Decker DeGraafWashingtonJR$805K
7Brody FoleyLouisvilleJR$778K
8Walker LyonsBYUJR$763K
9DJ VonnahmeIowaSO$725K
10Jeremiah HasleyDukeJR$724K
11Ethan DavisTennesseeJR$706K
12Zack MarshallMichiganSR$680K
13Cole RuskArizonaSR$668K
14Jaden PlattArkansasJR$663K
15Willie RodriguezKentuckyJR$658K

Green's $1.00M leads Carter by less than 2%, even though Carter actually carries the higher performance grade (99 to Green's 98). The gap is followers: Green has 160,280 to Carter's 20,415, a difference the model is clearly pricing. Every name here is checkable in real time in the termiNIL terminal.

Why does tight end already have a $1 million player when running back doesn't?

Green's $1.00M is real, but it isn't the tight end position's highest number. Oregon's Kendre Harrison carries a raw modeled value of $1.32M and USC's Mark Bowman sits at $1.28M — both higher than anyone in the table above. termiNIL's valuation audit excludes both from rankings: Harrison is a true freshman with no recorded snaps and no performance grade, and Bowman, also a freshman, shows the same pattern. A third name, Georgia's Elyiss Williams ($976K), is held out for being valued richly at fourth string on the depth chart. Those figures are live on the site because the underlying model produces them from recruiting and role signals before a player has taken a college snap — but they aren't fit to print as this position's leaders until a grade or a snap count catches up to the number.

Why is Kansas State's Linkon Cure valued third despite an F grade?

Cure's $856K ranks third at the position even though his performance grade is 9 out of 100 — the lowest possible letter grade — and termiNIL marks the value itself "low confidence." He wasn't flagged by the audit, so the number stands, but it's a clean example of a player whose recruiting profile and role are pulling the model's estimate well above what his current on-field grade alone would suggest. It's the tight end equivalent of a running back with a poor grade still ranking on opportunity and workload rather than production to date.

Is tight end pay spread evenly compared to other positions?

Moderately — tighter than most skill positions, but not the flattest in the model. Tight end's 90th percentile sits at $306K against a $77K median, a 3.97x spread. That's tighter than running back (4.36x) and edge rusher (4.28x), but wider than quarterback (3.06x) and center (2.69x), the two most evenly distributed positions termiNIL prices. On the mean-to-median measure the story is similar: tight end's $130,183 average is 1.69x its median, essentially tied with edge rusher (1.68x) and just ahead of running back (1.76x). Tight end has a real ceiling, but it isn't a position built for a long tail of outliers the way wide receiver (12.81x on the same 90th-percentile measure) is.

How much of the total NIL market goes to tight ends?

Tight ends total $115.86M in modeled NIL value, 3.86% of the sport's $3.00B market. That's meaningfully below their 6.13% share of the 14,519 FBS players termiNIL prices — tight ends hold a smaller cut of the money than their share of the roster would predict. It's the same direction as running back's gap, just wider: the further a position sits from the ball, the less of the market's dollars it tends to hold relative to its headcount.

Every figure here reprices as depth charts move and grades update, and the audit that held three names out of this list runs fresh with every model update. Check the full tight end depth chart in the termiNIL terminal, see how the valuation model works, or compare the position against the backfield in the running back rankings.

Frequently asked questions

Who is the most valuable tight end in college football?
termiNIL's model values LSU's Trey'Dez Green highest among ranked tight ends at a modeled $1.00 million, just ahead of Texas Tech's Terrance Carter at $987K and Kansas State's Linkon Cure at $856K. These are modeled estimates of a player's overall NIL package, not confirmed or reported contract terms, and the gap between the top two is under 2%.
Has any tight end reached $1 million in NIL value?
Yes — Green's $1.00 million is the only ranked tight end value to clear that mark, a threshold no running back in termiNIL's model has reached. It is a narrow crossing: Carter sits at $987K, just under seven figures, and the next several names compress quickly from there.
Why aren't Oregon's Kendre Harrison and USC's Mark Bowman on this list if they're valued higher than Green?
Both carry raw modeled values above Green's — $1.32M and $1.28M — but termiNIL's valuation audit flags both as implausible: neither has a performance grade or a recorded snap yet. The audit holds rich, unsupported figures like these out of rankings until a grade, a model floor, or an explicit acknowledgement resolves them, rather than presenting them as the position's real leaders.
Is tight end pay spread evenly compared to other positions?
More evenly than most skill positions, though not the flattest overall. Tight end's 90th percentile is 3.97 times its median, tighter than running back (4.36x) and edge rusher (4.28x), but wider than quarterback (3.06x) and center (2.69x) — the two most evenly distributed positions in the model.
How much of the total NIL market goes to tight ends?
Tight ends total $115.86M in modeled NIL value, 3.86% of the sport's $3.00B market, across 890 players — 6.13% of every FBS player termiNIL prices. That means tight ends collectively hold a smaller share of the money than their share of the roster would predict.

See every number behind this

termiNIL prices all 14,000+ FBS players with one transparent model. Open the terminal and check any roster, position group, or player yourself.

Launch the terminal
Methodology note. All player valuations on termiNIL are modeled estimates produced by a transparent bottom-up factor model — position base × role × production grade × team × market × social reach. They are not reported salaries, verified contract figures, or statements of fact about any athlete's actual compensation, and they are calibrated on an ongoing basis against confirmed market data. termiNIL is independent and is not affiliated with the NCAA, the College Sports Commission, any school, collective, or agency.

Keep reading